Library Millage Replacement
Bloomfield Hills · Oakland County County · November 3, 2026
The question on your ballot
Shall the City of Bloomfield Hills be authorized to renew the existing library millage of .52 mills per year (as reduced by required millage rollbacks) due to expire in 2026, with a renewed library millage of up to .52 mills ($.52 per $1,000.00 taxable value) a year for a period of six years commencing with the July 2027 levy and raising approximately $440,405 in the first year, for the purposes of funding a library contract with Baldwin Public Library of Birmingham, Michigan, to provide library services for the residents of the City of Bloomfield Hills and the employers and employees of businesses located in the City of Bloomfield Hills, which library services would include full library privileges to the Baldwin Public Library, including borrowing privileges and all other services of the Baldwin Public Library, on the same basis as such services are available to the residents of the City of Birmingham and the employers and employees of businesses located in the City of Birmingham?
In plain language
A VoterDecoder summary of the official measure text.
Bloomfield Hills voters are asked to renew the city library millage of up to .52 mills ($.52 per $1,000.00 of taxable value) a year for six years, starting with the July 2027 levy. The current millage expires in 2026. The money would fund a library contract with the Baldwin Public Library of Birmingham. Under that contract, residents and workers in Bloomfield Hills would receive full library privileges, including borrowing, on the same basis as Birmingham residents. The question estimates about $440,405 would be raised in the first year. A YES vote renews the millage; a NO vote means it is not renewed.
Official ballot arguments
No official arguments were filed for or against this measure.
What supporters and opponents say — outside sources (not official ballot arguments)
Statements by campaigns, officials and news coverage, quoted with attribution and linked to the original. VoterDecoder did not write them and does not endorse either side.
Supporters say
No public statements in favor were found.
Opponents say
No public statements against were found.