VoterDecoder
← Back to your ballot
Taxes & Spending Property Tax (Prop 13)

Property Tax (Prop 13)

Reads at about grade 7Both sides shown6 sources cited

Grounded in 6 cited sources spanning left · center-left · center-right · right · academic — each linked below, so you can judge them yourself.

Proposition 13 is a California law that limits a property's local tax rate to 1 percent of its value.

What it is

Proposition 13 is a California law that caps property taxes. The state's nonpartisan Legislative Analyst's Office explains the main rule: a property's tax rate for all local governments is capped at 1 percent of its value, with a few exceptions to help pay for some public debt. Research on the law's effects is mixed. A study of home tenure from 1970 to 2000 found that California homeowners and renters stayed put a bit longer than people in other states, but one analysis says the law did not actually stop high taxes or shrink the size of government here. The law is still in place today, and people still debate who it helps and who it costs.

How it works

Prop 13 set that same 1 percent cap, with a few exceptions for public debt, and the rule applies to homes and businesses alike. That last part matters: CalMatters reports that companies such as "Chevron, Intel and IBM were and are paying taxes based on land values from 1975." People still disagree about what this has meant in practice. Supporters say the law saves homeowners a lot of money. Critics say those savings are not shared evenly, and point to businesses still benefiting from those old valuations as part of the problem. The two sides argue about whether the benefits are worth the costs.

The debate — equal weight, both sides

The case for keeping Proposition 13
center-right

Supporters say Prop 13 protects people from losing their homes to rising taxes, and makes tax bills easier to predict so owners can plan ahead -- something that matters most for retirees on fixed incomes. Supporters also point to big savings. The Cato Institute says the law helped "save the average homeowner in California tens of thousands of dollars." Many supporters also see the law as a check on government, keeping more money in families' hands. To them, the savings and the safety are worth it.

The case for reforming Proposition 13
center-left

Critics say Prop 13 is unfair and starves public services, because the biggest breaks do not reach everyone equally. One review found that homeowners in richer, whiter areas "saved more than $10,000 annually" -- about five times the savings in minority areas. The business side compounds the problem. Critics note that the same rules letting businesses like Chevron, Intel, and IBM lock in decades-old 1975 land values still apply today. Many critics want to tax business property at its full value while still protecting homeowners. To them, the law's costs fall on the wrong people.

Sources

Behind the summary
Cited by "The case for keeping Proposition 13"
Cited by "The case for reforming Proposition 13"

On your ballot

The two sides appear only when both are sourced, and every explainer is reviewed by a person before it goes live. We summarize what each side argues; we never tell you how to vote.