Renewal of Expiring Capital Project Levy To Fund Technology
ROCORI Public School District School District · November 3, 2026
The question on your ballot
The school board of Independent School District No. 750 (Rocori School District) has proposed a capital project levy authorization of 1.836% times the net tax capacity of the school district. This authorization would renew the school districts existing authorization which is scheduled to expire after taxes payable in 2027. The proposed capital project levy authorization will raise approximately $497,414 for taxes payable in 2028, the first year it is to be levied, and would be authorized for ten years. The estimated total cost of the projects to be funded over that time period is approximately $4,974,140. The additional revenue from the proposed capital project levy authorization will provide funds for the acquisition, installation, replacement, support and maintenance of software, software licenses, computers, improved technology equipment, networks, infrastructure, and the costs of technology related personnel and training. Shall the capital project levy authorization proposed by the school board by Independent School District No. 750 be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING TO RENEW AN EXISTING CAPITAL PROJECTS REFERENDUM THAT IS SCHEDULED TO EXPIRE.
In plain language
A VoterDecoder summary of the official measure text.
ROCORI schools asks voters to renew its technology capital project levy, which is a property tax set aside for technology. The new levy would be 1.836% of the district's net tax capacity and would renew an existing levy set to expire after taxes payable in 2027. It would raise about $497,414 for taxes payable in 2028 and last ten years. The ballot notes that a YES vote renews an expiring levy. A YES vote approves the renewal. A NO vote means the levy is not renewed and the current one expires after taxes payable in 2027.
Fiscal impact
About $497,414 for taxes payable in 2028, for 10 years (about $4.97 million in all).
Official ballot arguments
Minnesota ballot questions don't come with official arguments for or against.
What supporters and opponents say — outside sources (not official ballot arguments)
Statements by campaigns, officials and news coverage, quoted with attribution and linked to the original. VoterDecoder did not write them and does not endorse either side.
Supporters say
No public statements in favor were found.
Opponents say
No public statements against were found.