Approval of Capital Project Levy Authorization
Campbell-Tintah Public School District School District · November 3, 2026
The question on your ballot
The school board of Independent School District No. 852 (Campbell-Tintah) has also proposed a capital project levy authorization of .78692% times the net tax capacity of the school district. The additional revenue from the proposed authorization will be used to provide funds for deferred maintenance projects^ facility infrastructure improvements^ safety and security enhancements^ technology and related technology support, maintenance, personnel, and training^ transportation-related vehicles^ instructional materials^ utility service costs^ and other operating capital revenue purposes. The proposed capital project levy authorization will raise approximately $100,000 for taxes payable in 2027, the first year it is to be levied, and would be authorized for ten years. The estimated total cost of the projects to be funded over that time period is approximately $1,000,000. If School District Question 1 is approved, shall the capital project levy authorization proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 852 also be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE.
In plain language
A VoterDecoder summary of the official measure text.
This question from Campbell-Tintah schools (Independent School District No. 852) counts only if School District Question 1 is approved. It asks whether the district may also adopt a capital project levy, a property tax for a set list of school projects and purchases, of .78692% of net tax capacity. It would raise about $100,000 for taxes payable in 2027 and run ten years. The question lists uses including deferred maintenance, safety and security, technology, vehicles and instructional materials. The ballot notes that a YES vote is a vote for a property tax increase. A YES vote approves the levy. A NO vote means it is not approved.
Fiscal impact
About $100,000 for taxes payable in 2027, at .78692% of net tax capacity, for ten years (estimated project cost about $1,000,000).
Official ballot arguments
Minnesota ballot questions don't come with official arguments for or against.
What supporters and opponents say — outside sources (not official ballot arguments)
Statements by campaigns, officials and news coverage, quoted with attribution and linked to the original. VoterDecoder did not write them and does not endorse either side.
Supporters say
No public statements in favor were found.
Opponents say
No public statements against were found.