Ballot questionBridgeport-Spaulding Community School DistrictParcel tax

II. Sinking Fund Millage Proposal

Bridgeport-Spaulding Community School District · November 3, 2026

The question on your ballot

This proposal renews 2.9548 mills of building and site sinking fund millage previously approved by the electors and restores millage lost as a result of the reduction required by the Michigan Constitution of 1963. Shall the currently authorized millage rate limitation on the amount of taxes which may be assessed against all property in Bridgeport-Spaulding Community School District, Saginaw County, Michigan, be renewed by 2.9548 mills ($2.9548 on each $1,000 of taxable valuation) and also be increased by 0.0452 mill ($0.0452 on each $1,000 of taxable valuation) for a total of 3 mills, for a period of 10 years, 2027 to 2036, inclusive, to continue to provide for a sinking fund for the purchase of real estate for sites for and the construction or repair of school buildings; for school security improvements; for the acquisition or upgrading of technology; and all other purposes authorized by law; the estimate of the revenue the school district will collect if the millage is approved and levied in 2027 is approximately $1,300,000 (this is a renewal of millage that will expire with the 2026 tax levy and a restoration of millage lost as a result of the reduction required by the Michigan Constitution of 1963)?

In plain language

A VoterDecoder summary of the official measure text.

Bridgeport-Spaulding Community School District voters in Saginaw County are asked to renew 2.9548 mills of building and site sinking fund millage and increase it by 0.0452 mill, for a total of 3 mills, for 10 years, 2027 through 2036 inclusive, for school sites, buildings, security, and technology. This renews millage expiring with the 2026 tax levy and restores millage lost to the constitutional reduction. The estimated 2027 revenue is approximately $1,300,000. A YES vote approves both the renewal and the increase; a NO vote rejects the whole proposal, so neither is approved.

Official ballot arguments

No official arguments were filed for or against this measure.

What supporters and opponents say — outside sources (not official ballot arguments)

Statements by campaigns, officials and news coverage, quoted with attribution and linked to the original. VoterDecoder did not write them and does not endorse either side.

Supporters say

No public statements in favor were found.

Opponents say

No public statements against were found.

See everything on your ballot — enter your address →

Official text from the elections office; outside statements are quoted with attribution. Confirm your official ballot with your county elections office. We never tell you how to vote.