Measure G: City of Scotts Valley Transient Occupancy Tax Increase
City of Scotts Valley · Santa Cruz County · November 3, 2026
The question on your ballot
Shall the City of Scotts Valley adopt an ordinance amending Section 3.24.030 of the Municipal Code raising the transient occupancy tax rate from 11% to 13%?
In plain language
Measure G would raise the hotel tax in the City of Scotts Valley, which is known as the transient occupancy tax, from 11% to 13%. Hotel and motel guests who stay fewer than 30 days in a row pay this tax on their room rent. For example, a guest in a $100 room now pays $11 a night in tax, and under Measure G that guest would pay $13. All of this tax money goes into the city's general fund. It pays for city services such as police, recreation, park maintenance, and street repair. Because it is a general tax, it needs a simple majority vote to pass. A YES vote raises the tax to 13%. A NO vote leaves the tax unchanged at 11%.
Fiscal impact
Raises the hotel tax from 11% to 13% of room rent, which is from $11 to $13 a night on a $100 room. The official materials do not give a revenue estimate or an end date.
Impartial analysis
IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS BY CITY ATTORNEY MEASURE G City of Scotts Valley Transient Occupancy Tax Increase This ballot measure, if adopted by City voters, would amend the Scotts Valley Municipal Code by raising the T ransient Occupancy Tax (TOT) rate from the current rate of 11 percent to 1 3 percent. The T ransient Occupancy Tax is a tax paid by hotel and motel guests who spend fewer than 30 consecutive days in a hotel or motel in the City. The tax is on the room rent paid. For example, a hotel guest currently pays $11 tax per night on a $100 hotel room. If the ballot measure is adopted, the hotel guest would pay $13 tax per night on a $100 hotel room. All of the City's transient occupancy tax revenue is deposited into the City's General Fund and used to pay for City operations and programs , including police services, recreation, park maintenance, the repair of streets and roads, and other essential City services. This ballot measure therefore proposes a "general purpose tax" rather than a "special purpose tax" and requires a simple majority vote for adoption. Since many of the City's hotel/motel guests are non-City residents who are tourists or City visitors, much of the increased tax revenue generated by this measure, if adopted by the voters, would be paid by non-City residents. The tax revenue will underwrite the costs of providing municipal services to local visitors and City residents. A “Yes” vote will increase the tax from 11 % to 13%. A “No” vote will leave the tax unchanged. This ballot measure has been placed on the ballot by the Scotts Valley City Council. _______________________ Kirsten Powell City Attorney City of Scotts Valley Kirsten Powell (Aug 12, 2026 13:16:44 GMT) Kirsten Powell Measure G Impartial Analysis 2026 Final Audit Report 2026-08-12 Created: 2026-08-11 By: Cathie Simonovich (csimonovich@scottsvalley.gov) Status: Signed Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAA-j2c7i0ssfVuJrQWMDLTKqx7XgEflg8a "Measure G Impartial Analysis 2026" History Document created by Cathie Simonovich (csimonovich@scottsvalley.gov) 2026-08-11 - 8:22:58 PM GMT Document emailed to kpowell@scottsvalley.gov for signature 2026-08-11 - 8:23:18 PM GMT Email viewed by kpowell@scottsvalley.gov 2026-08-12 - 12:44:20 PM GMT Signer kpowell@scottsvalley.gov entered name at signing as Kirsten Powell 2026-08-12 - 1:16:42 PM GMT Document e-signed by Kirsten Powell (kpowell@scottsvalley.gov) Signature Date: 2026-08-12 - 1:16:44 PM GMT - Time Source: server - Signature Appearance Selected: MOBILE_TYPE Agreement completed. 2026-08-12 - 1:16:44 PM GMT
Official ballot arguments
Filed for the official voter guide by each side, printed as submitted.
The official arguments will appear here once both sides’ arguments are on file.
What supporters and opponents say — outside sources (not official ballot arguments)
Statements by campaigns, officials and news coverage, quoted with attribution and linked to the original. VoterDecoder did not write them and does not endorse either side.
Supporters say
No public statements in favor were found.
Opponents say
No public statements against were found.