Measure DCity of Los AltosLand use zoning

Measure D: Citizen-Sponsored Initiative

City of Los Altos · Santa Clara County · November 3, 2026

The question on your ballot

Shall the Ordinance, which prohibits the City of Los Altos from selling, leasing, conveying, or declaring as surplus land the ten City-owned Downtown Parking Plazas for any reason, or from authorizing new uses or physical alterations that would diminish protected trees or parking availability, access, or convenience, unless separately approved by a majority of voters, except that two Parking Plazas may be developed for affordable housing without a vote, be adopted?

In plain language

Measure D is a Los Altos city measure. It is about the ten city-owned Downtown Parking Plazas. A YES vote passes a new city law. It stops the city from selling these parking plazas. It also stops the city from leasing them. And it stops the city from declaring them surplus land. The city could not cut protected trees or parking there either. Voters would have to approve any of these changes first. One exception applies. The city could build affordable housing on up to two of the plazas without a vote. A NO vote does not add these protections.

Impartial analysis

CITY ATTORNEY’S IMPARTIAL ANALYIS OF MEASURE D Measure D is a voter-sponsored initiative measure. If approved, Measure D would a mend the Los Altos (“City”) Municipal Code by adding a new Chapter 14.92 entitled “Downtown Parking Plazas. ” Measure D defines t he Downtown Parking Plazas as the “publicly- accessible, open and surface parking lots located in the Downtown area which are owned by the City.” They are commonly known as Plazas 1 through 10. The 2026 Ballot Measure Impact Analysis - 9212 Report (“9212 Report”) for Measure D found that “… the Ballot Measure would potentially limit new development by adding additional constraints to development on the City-owned Downtown Parking Plazas. Although there is an exception for ‘affordable housing’ on Plazas 7 and 8, it is not clear if mixed-income housing or other development programs that include affordable housing could be approved without a subsequent Ballot Measure. T his would impact development of even affordable multifamily housing on all these lots, including P lazas 7 and 8, by potentially complicating development opportunities. This would impact Program 1.H (‘Facilitation housing on City-owned sites’) and other Housing Element programs and policies.” Unless approved by a majority vote of the City’s voters, Measure D would prohibit the City from taking the following actions affecting the Parking Plazas: selling, leasing, or otherwise conveying them; changing their use which would dimmish the availability of public parking; declaring them as surplus land; constructing any capital project that permanently diminishes the availability of public parking; modifying them by adding additional levels; modifying them in a way that would negatively affect protected trees or tree canopy; or entering into a development agreement or similar agreement that would allow a third-party to take action prohibited by it. Measure D provides few actions to be taken without a majority vote of the City’s voters such as maintaining and repairing the Parking Plazas and hosting the farmers’ market or similar short-term events. The processing, interpretation, and validity of Measure D would be governed by the Election Code and state law. The 9212 Report found “If the Ballot Measure were to pass and then subsequently be challenged in court, the City would be required to pay defense costs of the challenge and potentially indemnify the proponents. The City would also be required to defend the Ballot Measure and any implementation of the Ballot Measure, until ended by voters.” The 9212 Report attached the June 15, 2026, YIMBY Law letter that stated, “To dispel any potential ambiguity, we are prepared to sue Los Altos the instant this measure is adopted.” Measure D’s defense costs would come from the C ity’s General Fund. A “ Yes” vote will prohibit the City from selling, leasing, conveying, declaring surplus, or permanently repurposing the Parking Plazas for any use other than surface parking without a majority vote of the City’s voters. A “No” vote will preserve the City’s discretion to use the Parking Plazas for any use permitted by local, st ate, and/ or fede ral l aw. Jolie Houston, Los Altos City Attorney The above statement is an impartial analysis of Measure D. If you desire a copy of the measure or ordinance, please call the City Clerk's office at [phone number omitted].

Official ballot arguments

Filed for the official voter guide by each side, printed as submitted.

The official arguments will appear here once both sides’ arguments are on file.

What supporters and opponents say — outside sources (not official ballot arguments)

Statements by campaigns, officials and news coverage, quoted with attribution and linked to the original. VoterDecoder did not write them and does not endorse either side.

Supporters say

  • “City councils have previously, and regretfully, given away or sold public land without voter approval.”
    — Measure D campaign (For Downtown Los Altos, Yes on D), Los Altos Town Crier (2026) · Our downtown, our decision
    Read the source →

Opponents say

  • “It is on behalf of these local businesses that LAVA writes to express our formal opposition to Measure D.”
    — Board of Directors, Los Altos Village Association, Los Altos Town Crier (2026) · Vast asphalt won't save downtown businesses; vibrancy will
    Read the source →
The issue, explainedGovernment & Ethics →
See everything on your ballot — enter your address →

Official text from the elections office; outside statements are quoted with attribution. Confirm your official ballot with your county elections office. We never tell you how to vote.