Measure ALe Grand Union High School DistrictGeneral obligation bondBond

Measure A: Measure A - Le Grand Union High School District

Le Grand Union High School District · Merced County · November 3, 2026

The question on your ballot

MEASURE A Le Grand Union High School District To improve the quality of education; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; repair/replace leaky roofs; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; replace deteriorating plumbing systems; and make health and safety improvements; shall Le Grand Union High School District's measure authorizing $9,100,000 of bonds at legal rates be adopted, generating on average $672,300 annually while outstanding at annual rates of approximately $25 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?

In plain language

Measure A asks voters in the Le Grand Union High School District to approve $9,100,000 in bonds. The money would modernize outdated classrooms and restrooms. It would repair or replace leaky roofs and upgrade electrical systems. It would also replace old plumbing and make health and safety improvements. A YES vote approves the bonds. They would be paid back through a tax of about $25 per $100,000 of assessed value. This averages about $672,300 a year while the bonds are outstanding. A NO vote means the bonds are not approved. The measure states no money would go to salaries. All money would stay local.

Fiscal impact

The measure allows $9,100,000 in bonds. Annual rates would be about $25 per $100,000 of assessed value. That would raise about $672,300 a year while the bonds last.

Impartial analysis

COUNTY COUNSEL IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS OF LE GRAND UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT MEASURE A T his bond measure analysis is provided in accordance with Elections Code section 9500, et seq., which authorizes a school district’s issuance of general obligation bonds for specific school district purposes. This measure authorizes Le Grand Union High School District (“District”) to issue and sell up to $9,100,000 in general obligation bonds for the construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation or replacement of school facilities, including the furnishing and equipping of school facilities. I ssued bonds would be repaid by tax levies on non-exempt taxable property within the District. There is no assurance or guarantee the District will issue the maximum amount of the bonded indebtedness authorized; or that beyond revenues generated, the proposed projects will be funded by matching State funds sufficient to complete them. A ccording to the Tax Rate Statement submitted by the District, the best estimate of the highest ad valorem tax which would be levied on taxable property to repay the bonds over their term is $25.25 per year per $100,000 of assessed value. The best estimate from official sources of the total debt service, including principal and interest, is that $21,046,910 would be required to be repaid if all the bonds are issued and sold. The final year in which the tax is anticipated to be collected is fiscal year 2057-58. N o proceeds authorized by this measure can be used for District salaries or administrative and operating expenses. Proceeds can only be used for the purposes stated in the measure. Both annual and independent financial audits and oversight by an appointed citizen’s committee for performance, utilization, and compliance must be conducted under the measure and by law. The citizen’s committee cannot include any District vendors or employees. A pproval of this measure requires the affirmative vote of 55% of the qualified voters. A “YES” vote is a vote in favor of authorizing the Le Grand Union High School District to issue and sell up to $9,100,000 in general obligation bonds. A “NO” vote means the voter is against authorizing the Le Grand Union High School District to issue and sell up to $9,100,000 in general obligation bonds. This measure is placed on the ballot by the Le Grand Union High School District. Merced County Counsel Forrest W. Hansen /s/ Thomas E. Ebersole, Assistant County Counsel

Official ballot arguments

Filed for the official voter guide by each side, printed as submitted.

The official arguments will appear here once both sides’ arguments are on file.

What supporters and opponents say — outside sources (not official ballot arguments)

Statements by campaigns, officials and news coverage, quoted with attribution and linked to the original. VoterDecoder did not write them and does not endorse either side.

Supporters say

No public statements in favor were found.

Opponents say

No public statements against were found.

The issue, explainedEducation →
See everything on your ballot — enter your address →

Official text from the elections office; outside statements are quoted with attribution. Confirm your official ballot with your county elections office. We never tell you how to vote.