Measure SCity of AlbanyTax other

Measure S: Measure S - City Of Albany - Real Property Transfer Tax Measure

City of Albany · Alameda County · November 3, 2026

The question on your ballot

To support City of Albany general services, with funding that cannot be taken by Sacramento, including: street and park maintenance, recreation, public safety, and environmental programs, shall a measure adjusting the City's real property transfer tax rate from $15.00 to between $10.00 and $30.00 per $1,000 purchased, depending upon the property's purchase price, providing an additional $1,000,000 annually, until ended by voters, with all funds remaining local be adopted?

In plain language

Measure S would change the City of Albany's tax on real estate sales. A YES vote adjusts the property transfer tax from a flat $15.00 per $1,000 of sale price to a sliding scale between $10.00 and $30.00 per $1,000, depending on the property's price. The money funds street and park maintenance, recreation, public safety, and environmental programs. A NO vote keeps the current flat $15.00 rate.

Fiscal impact

The new sliding-scale rate would raise about $1,000,000 more a year until voters end it.

Impartial analysis

CITY OF ALBANY CITY ATTORNEY’S IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS OF MEASURE “S” ADJUSTING THE CITY’S REAL PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX RATE Pursuant to City Measure “CC”, approved by Albany voters in 2020, the City currently imposes a real property transfer tax at an across-the-board rate of 1.5% of the purchase price/value of the real property interest transferred . The real property transfer tax is a general tax. Revenues are deposited into the General Fund and may be spent for any City expense like street and park maintenance, recreation, public safety, and environmental programs. Measure “S” was placed on the ballot by the Albany City Council on July 20, 2026 and, if approved by a majority of Albany voters (50%+1), will adjust the real property transfer tax from an across -the-board 1.5% rate to the following f ive-tiered rate structure , depending upon the purchase price/value transferred: ▪ 1.0% of the purchase price/value transferred, where the purchase price/value transferred is below the 25th percentile of transactions during the 12 months preceding September 1 of the preceding year, as recorded by the Alameda County Assessor, rounded to the nearest $100,000 increment; ▪ 1.5% of the purchase price/value transferred, where it is at the 25th percentile but below the 50th percentile of transactions during the same 12 months, rounded to the nearest $100,000 increment; ▪ 2.0% of the purchase price/value transferred, where it is at the 50th percentile but below the 75th percentile of transactions during the same 12 months, rounded to the nearest $100,000 increment; ▪ 2.5% of the purchase price/ value transferred, where it is at the 75th percentile but below the 90 th percentile o f transactions during the same 12 months, rounded to the nearest $100,000 increment; ▪ 3.0% of the purchase price/value transferred, where it is at or above the 90th percentile of transactions during the same 12 months, rounded to the nearest $100,000 increment. This rate adjustment is estimated to generate an additional $1,000,000 annually. The new rates would become effective on January 1, 2027 and remain in effect until repealed by voters at a subsequent election. The purposes for this tax would not change. The tax would remain a general tax which may fund any valid City purpose, like those identified above. Measure “S” does not change the current administration of the tax. The real property transfer tax generally applies to transactions involving the sale and purchase of r eal property. Certain transactions are exempted from the tax. For example, no tax is assessed where a new deed is recorded to correct an existing deed or when the purpose of the transfer is to divide community property. A “yes” vote on Measure “S” will approve the real property transfer tax rate adjustment. A “no” vote on Measure “S” will not approve the real property transfer tax rate adjustment. The above statement is an impartial analysis of Measure “S”. If you desire a copy of the Measure, please call the Office of the City Clerk at [phone number omitted] and a copy will be mailed at no cost to you. / s/ M alathy Subramanian City Attorney

Official ballot arguments

Filed for the official voter guide by each side, printed as submitted.

The official arguments will appear here once both sides’ arguments are on file.

What supporters and opponents say — outside sources (not official ballot arguments)

Statements by campaigns, officials and news coverage, quoted with attribution and linked to the original. VoterDecoder did not write them and does not endorse either side.

Supporters say

  • “Measure S protects the City's services we rely upon while making our tax system fairer.”
    — Albany City Council (Mayor Peggy McQuaid and Councilmembers Hansen-Romero, Miki, Jordan, Lopez), City of Albany City Clerk (2026) · Argument in Favor of Measure S
    Read the source →
  • “Based on the League of Women Voters of California position on the State and Local Government Finance System, the League supports this measure.”
    — League of Women Voters of Berkeley, Albany, Emeryville, League of Women Voters of Berkeley, Albany, Emeryville (2026) · Vote with the League November 2026 - Measure S
    Read the source →

Opponents say

  • “Albany has a housing affordability problem. Measure S makes it worse. Let's be real. Measure S increases the cost of buying and selling property, making Albany even less affordable.”
    — Francesco Papalia, former member, City of Albany Financial Advisory Committee, City of Albany City Clerk (2026) · Measure S - Primary Argument Against
    Read the source →
The issue, explainedTaxes & Spending →
See everything on your ballot — enter your address →

Official text from the elections office; outside statements are quoted with attribution. Confirm your official ballot with your county elections office. We never tell you how to vote.